timothy sykes logo

Videos- Penny Stocks Trade Guide

Why Internet IPOs Like Zynga Inc. (ZNGA) & Groupon Inc (GRPN) Are Failing

Timothy SykesAvatar
Written by Timothy Sykes
Updated 2/2/2021 7 min read

The New York Times recently blamed the weak IPO performance of these “superstar” internet companies on late-stage investments combined with the increased transparency regarding private company valuations thanks to new markets like Secondmarket, but the reality is more ironic:

The same viral and efficiency-inducing nature of the internet that has propelled these companies businesses’ is the cause their IPOs have basically bombed.

Sure, sure, Secondmarket, which allows investors to get a sense of what accredited investors are willing to pay in terms of valuation for private companies, hurts their IPO performance because those who REALLY want in can now purchase shares before the IPO.

And yes, late stage investments definitely dilute valuations and give early investors/insiders an easier and faster way out.

But the main reason these once thought “gimmes” are crashing — Groupon dropped 50% from its IPO highs, which itself was disappointing and Zynga’s IPO couldn’t even price above its expected range (pathetic for a company previously considered “hot”) not to mention that it finished down on its 1st day of trading from its pricing at $10/share and now sits in the $8s, looking like it too could drop 50% over the next few weeks — is because social media is both these companies’ gift and curse as the words of naysayers are now EVERYWHERE, and these negative stories spread far faster than anything positive.

Trust me, as a blogger focused on short selling, I know these things.

After all, stocks crash far quicker than it takes them to rise and fear spreads faster than positivity…especially in this dangerous market where the credibility of blue chips like Bank of America Corp (BAC) and entire countries like Italy and France are questioned daily.

Did Groupon and Zynga really think their eccentric management, iffy accounting and sketchy/ponzi-scheme-like viral growth would not be questioned?

Yup, I think that while they’re both proven leaders in their shady industries, they both underestimated just how many public inquisitors there would be and how fast that information would spread.

But the truth is that neither company has any choice but to accept these lower valuations and IPO because while they’re both growing fast, neither makes much money and their business models are VERY far from proven. They’ve rejected buyouts due to their ambition so they IPOed to get the $ before more negative information went viral.

After all, once you go viral, you can never go back, it’s only going to mount.

And as that negativity mounts, competitors with cooler and newer products can overtake you and then your most precious assets — revenue growth — is gone too so you won’t even be able to raise any money to compete.

As evidenced by Groupon’s SEC filing woes and Zynga’s management insistence that it’s all about the product, I’d say that despite the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars, and in some cases, billions, created for the top employees at each company, they understand their difficult predicament and so they’re going to battle as much as they can.

And that’s what the stock market is: a battle of companies trying to outwit their competition and dress up their businesses to make it look healthy and eternal for investors…investors have the choice to believe the BS or to cut through it.

Market historians know that despite bull markets, 70% of stocks drop each year — it’s in some book somewhere, go Google it — as public companies are the most desperate in the world and that entertainment outlets like CNBC and brokers and financial advisors of all shapes and sizes hide this fact as much as possible, preying on the naive to make them believe the stock market is an amazing opportunity.

Well, thanks to the social web, marketing lies are fast becoming obsolete and it’s not only bringing down IPOs that should have popped 200%, 300% or even 500% on the 1st day of trading back to reality, it’s also executing tyrants around the world…literally.

Oh yes, beware the social web and its implications: if you are profiting from lies and trying to hide the truth, you will eventually be discovered and outted.

Oh yes, I’m talking about penny stock promoters, your days of lying will soon be at an end as new projects and statistical information will help crush your deceits.

Obviously there will always be a few suckers, but the big business is in being honest…the inspiration to be fully honest and transparent has never been greater so if you’re a thief, the time to switch over is now…websites like Investimonials and Scambook (I’m founder and an investor, respectively) are the future.

And to those moronic short sellers who think that I’m hurting the availability of shares to short by my teaching information about how to short sell and which 6 brokers I use to short sell, think again…it’s always been difficult to short hard-to-borrow stocks, hence one of the biggest reasons why I became a teacher in the first place as I explained in this post.

The true beauty of the social web is that in all this destruction of lies and budding transparency, therein lies great opportunity.

For example, as I write this post, brokers around the world are figuring out ways to loan more stocks to allow for short selling…until my small influence, there was never this much demand for hard-to-borrow stocks and trust me I know because they’re coming to me to work on deals to get more shares out to the public who wants it…namely subscribers of my 4 newsletters.

Just because these internet IPOs are dropping nearly every day doesn’t mean there isn’t opportunity, the opportunity comes from short selling them when they break key support levels, just as I showed months ago when we NAILED the breakdown of Chinese Facebook wannabe Renren Inc (RENN) at $12, which is now trading in the $3s….watch the free video lesson

Internet Stock Go Plop
Internet Stock Go Plop

Contrary to the lies promoted by penny stock promoters, CNBC and their main hypocrite, the stock market isn’t full of opportunity for those who want to do simplistic research and invest in “solid companies”…that was so the 1990s pre-web, let alone pre-social web….remember Facebook was just invented a few years ago and it still has a ton of issues.

Experience, statistics and future academic studies show the greatest opportunity in the stock market exists for those willing to think outside the box and accept the stock market for the giant pump and dump scheme it is. ..accept that these internet IPOs suck, financially and business-wise and their stock prices finally reflect that sucking.

Accept short selling for the wondrous thing that it is, embrace the effects of transparency and the viral/efficiency nature of the social web and above all else, learn to profit from this new reality rather than being suckered by those who twist the truth for their own benefit, not yours.


How much has this post helped you?



Leave a reply

Author card Timothy Sykes picture

Timothy Sykes

Tim Sykes is a penny stock trader and teacher who became a self-made millionaire by the age of 22 by trading $12,415 of bar mitzvah money. After becoming disenchanted with the hedge fund world, he established the Tim Sykes Trading Challenge to teach aspiring traders how to follow his trading strategies. He’s been featured in a variety of media outlets including CNN, Larry King, Steve Harvey, Forbes, Men’s Journal, and more. He’s also an active philanthropist and environmental activist, a co-founder of Karmagawa, and has donated millions of dollars to charity.
Read More

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”