Press Alt+1 for screen-reader mode, Alt+0 to cancelAccessibility Screen-Reader Guide, Feedback, and Issue Reporting | New window

Stock News

Invest or Ignore? The Top Penny Stocks Ahead of Tariff Deadline

Timothy SykesAvatar
Written by Timothy Sykes
Updated 7/9/2025, 6:19 pm ET 6 min read

Trump’s August 1 tariff deadline isn’t just another headline — it’s a clear, time-stamped catalyst. 

14 countries. No extensions. No negotiations. Every supply-chain-heavy sector on the chopping block.

I’ve traded through market-shaking headlines before — and I’ve seen what happens when the market scrambles to price in an unpredictable future. Most large caps stall or sell off. But a handful of low-float penny stocks catch fire on the speculation. That’s where I focus.

If you want to know what I’m looking for — check out my free webinar here!

When tariffs come in, traders chase three themes:

  1. Domestic producers that benefit from import restrictions
  2. National security plays tied to critical tech or materials
  3. Anything remotely “Made in America” that sounds scalable

I don’t swing blindly into hype. I look for volume, price action, and confirmed patterns. Here are three names that fit the criteria heading into the next macro flashpoint.

3 Tariff Penny Stocks To Watch in July

TickerCompanyPerformance (YTD)
AMEX: TGBTaseko Mines Ltd.
NASDAQ: LAESSEALSQ Corp.
NASDAQ: QUBTQuantum Computing Inc.

Before you send in your orders, take note: I have NO plans to trade these stocks unless they fit my preferred setups. This is only a watchlist.

The best traders watch more than they trade. That’s what I’m trying to model here. Pay attention to the work that goes in, not the picks that come out.

Sign up for my NO-COST weekly watchlist to get my latest picks!

Here are the tariff penny stocks I’m watching in July:

Taseko Mines Ltd. (AMEX: TGB)

This is a copper trade, plain and simple. On June 26, Trump announced plans for a 50% tariff on foreign copper. The next day, copper futures posted their biggest single-day jump since 1989.

That success is trickling down to TGB.

Traders looking to front-run that move will chase domestic and North American producers. That’s TGB. The company owns and operates the Gibraltar mine in British Columbia, one of the largest open-pit copper mines in North America. This isn’t a junior explorer — they’re already producing.

It trades more like a momentum stock than a commodity name. If copper futures spike again on new tariff headlines, I expect TGB to show up on scanners. It already popped after the first copper news cycle — and this setup often comes in waves.

This is exactly the kind of ticker I watch for a breakout or a panic dip — nothing forced, no swing positions, just reacting to the price when volume confirms.

SEALSQ Corp. (NASDAQ: LAES)

Trump’s plan isn’t just about raw materials — it’s targeting imported semiconductors, electronics, and anything tied to secure communications. SEALSQ fits that narrative.

The company develops post-quantum security chips with design and integration work based in Arizona. It’s pushing a multi-national project called the Quantum Corridor, aimed at building quantum-resistant infrastructure across the U.S. and Europe. That includes secure microcontrollers, satellite encryption, and government-facing hardware.

During trade war cycles, anything with “domestic chip” exposure tends to attract speculative flows. We saw this in 2018 with U.S. fabs and again in 2023 when export bans hit Chinese AI chips. Now tariffs are back in focus, and LAES gives traders a familiar story: small float, government-aligned narrative, and post-quantum buzz.

It’s not a clean long-term play, but if the tape starts rotating into U.S. chip alternatives, this ticker could catch a short-term wave. I’ve traded setups like this dozens of times — and when the press releases hit, the chart can move fast.

More Breaking News

Quantum Computing Inc. (NASDAQ: QUBT)

This is one of the few penny stocks that ties directly into national-security tech — and that matters in a trade war environment. QUBT already has a NASA contract. It recently raised $200 million from institutional investors, and in June it was added to the Russell 3000.

That combination — capital, credibility, and contracts — gives it more weight than most speculative tech names.

Read more: QUBT Stock Surges Following Nvidia’s Enthusiasm on Quantum Tech

The tariff angle here is simple: every time Washington ramps up trade restrictions, it doubles down on domestic tech independence. That means semiconductors, AI, and increasingly, quantum computing. Politicians love to frame quantum as a national defense priority, and QUBT’s contract work puts it right in the middle of that pitch.

This isn’t a buy-and-hold. It’s a former 1,800%* runner now consolidating with real funding and narrative tailwinds. If another wave of “build domestic tech” rhetoric hits as we move toward August 1, I’ll be watching for patterns I recognize — ideally a breakout with volume or a sharp pullback that finds support.

* Past performance doesn’t predict future results.

Bottom Line

These aren’t just random small caps — they all fit a specific, time-sensitive narrative tied directly to Trump’s tariff plan. That’s what I look for: catalysts that create volatility, stories that move markets, and charts that show clear setups.

The biggest mistake new traders make is trying to predict outcomes. That’s not the job. The job is to prepare for multiple scenarios, react to the ones that line up, and cut fast when they don’t.

No emotion. No ego. No guessing.

I’m watching these three into the August 1 deadline — not because I believe in them long term, but because I’ve seen what happens when narratives like this catch fire.

Stick to the patterns. Stay disciplined. Let the trade come to you.


How much has this post helped you?



Leave a reply

Author card Timothy Sykes picture

Timothy Sykes

Tim Sykes is a penny stock trader and teacher who became a self-made millionaire by the age of 22 by trading $12,415 of bar mitzvah money. After becoming disenchanted with the hedge fund world, he established the Tim Sykes Trading Challenge to teach aspiring traders how to follow his trading strategies. He’s been featured in a variety of media outlets including CNN, Larry King, Steve Harvey, Forbes, Men’s Journal, and more. He’s also an active philanthropist and environmental activist, a co-founder of Karmagawa, and has donated millions of dollars to charity.
Read More


* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”

ts swipe photo
Join Thousands Profiting From Smart Trades!
TRADE LIKE TIM