timothy sykes logo

Stock News

Is It Too Late to Buy Intel Stock as It Struggles With Challenges?

Timothy SykesAvatar
Written by Timothy Sykes
Reviewed by Jack Kellogg Fact-checked by Ellis Hobbs

Intel Corporation faces a challenging market environment, significantly affected by recent adverse news headlines. Particularly, the announcement of a major delay in its new chip production line and ongoing supply chain disruptions have raised investor concerns. Despite attempts to reassure stakeholders, these developments have led to heightened uncertainty. Consequently, on Tuesday, Intel Corporation’s stocks are trading down by -3.01 percent.

Intel’s Recent Moves and Market Sentiments

  • CEO Pat Gelsinger announced Intel is halfway to reducing its workforce by 15,000, targeting global real estate reduction, and selling part of its stake in Altera to improve its balance sheet.
  • Intel’s financial troubles are casting doubts on the $20B incentive package from the Biden-Harris administration, crucial for U.S. chipmaking strategy.
  • Erste Group downgraded Intel to Sell from Hold due to quality problems and significant debt.

Candlestick Chart

Live Update at 13:32:41 EST: On Tuesday, October 01, 2024 Intel Corporation stock [NASDAQ: INTC] is trending down by -3.01%! Discover the key drivers behind this movement as well as our expert analysis in the detailed breakdown below.

Quick Overview of Intel’s Recent Earnings Report and Financial Metrics

When we delve into Intel’s financial statements, it’s akin to reading a dense novel: you need to pay attention to every detail, every subplot. In Q2 2024, Intel’s revenue amounted to $54.2B. This may sound like a large number, but when you peel back the layers, the decline over recent years is significant. Revenue has fallen by 10.78% over the past three years and 4.77% over the past five years.

The company’s gross margin stands at 41.4%, decent but not enough to overshadow its troubles. The EBIT margin, sitting at 10%, suggests Intel is struggling with operational efficiency. Moving deeper, Intel’s profit margin is a mere 1.77%, laying bare the struggle to convert revenue into profit.

Remarkably, Intel’s PE ratio is an alarming 102.89. What does this mean? Investors are either incredibly optimistic about Intel’s future prospects, or the stock is severely overvalued. Compare this with its peers, and Intel’s PE ratio shoots out like a flare in the night.

Another troubling aspect is the financial strength. With a total debt-to-equity ratio of 0.46 and long-term debt standing tall at $48.3B, Intel’s financial obligations are hefty. The current ratio at 1.8 offers a bit of solace, showing they have the goods to cover short-term liabilities, but the quick ratio drops to 0.7, hinting at potential liquidity issues.

A narrative of challenges isn’t complete without mentioning Intel’s asset turnover, which stands at a mere 0.3. This indicates inefficient use of assets to generate sales. The story continues with receivables turnover at 18, reflecting slow collection on sales made on credit.

More Breaking News

Intel’s Other Financial Highlights:

  • Depreciation: With $2.2B in depreciation costs, Intel’s assets are burning a hole in the balance sheet.
  • Operating Cash Flow: The operating cash flow for Q2 2024 was $2.3B, offsetting an intimidating $9.1B in investing cash flow.
  • Net Income: Intel posted a net loss of $1.65B from continuing operations, a red flag signaling operational difficulties.

The given data paints Intel as a massive ship navigating through treacherous waters, struggling to find a profitable course. Now, let’s look at recent developments.

CEO Pat Gelsinger’s Workforce Reduction and Real Estate Plan

Intel’s CEO, Pat Gelsinger, recently took the helm and made bold moves. Announcing they were more than halfway to hitting their target of reducing the workforce by 15,000 employees might seem drastic but was needed for operational efficiencies. You know, like pruning a tree to help it grow better.

Through voluntary retirements and separations, Intel is slimming down. Gelsinger’s strategy also includes chopping two-thirds of Intel’s global real estate footprint and selling off parts of its stake in Altera. This doesn’t just improve liquidity; it’s a clear message that Intel is ready to shed non-core assets and minimize unnecessary expenditures.

However, these measures are a double-edged sword. While they can strengthen the balance sheet, the heavy trimming indicates deeper-rooted issues. On Sep 16, 2024, Intel’s announcement reverberated across the market, sending a mixed sentiment. Potential investors grappled with whether these actions signaled a turnaround or were merely desperate attempts.

Financial Struggles Impacting U.S. Chipmaking Strategy

Imagine you’re building a skyscraper, and midway through, you run out of funds. That’s where Intel finds itself with the $20B incentive package from the Biden-Harris administration. Originally expected to bolster the U.S. chipmaking strategy, Intel’s struggles have cast heavy doubts on receiving this package.

The firm’s financial instability threatens broader policy ambitions—like securing a chip supply for the Pentagon and achieving significant global processor production by 2030. On Sep 4, 2024, Intel’s woes became a significant talking point. The chip giant’s struggles put not just its future but also a national strategy at risk. Investors couldn’t help but notice, and the market reacted predictably.

Downgrade by Erste Group

Adding salt to the wound, Erste Group downgraded Intel from Hold to Sell on Sep 5, 2024. Their concerns? Intel’s systemic quality issues and mounting debt. This downgrade was like announcing to the world that the ship has sprung a leak.

The downgrade spooked investors, leading to a dip in stock prices. The tangible impact of this downgrade was immediate—no investor likes hearing the words “quality problems” and “high debt.” Suddenly, what seemed like a strategic revamp took on an air of crisis management.

Major Restructurings and Capital Spend Revisions

There’s talk of Gelsinger planning a sweeping restructuring, including cuts in various business segments and tweaking capital spend. This news from earlier in September wasn’t taken lightly. During premarket trading, Intel’s stock fell more than 1%—an alarming plunge—a strong indicator of investor trepidation about the future.

Gelsinger floated the idea of possibly selling the programmable chip unit Altera and scrapping plans for a $32B factory in Germany. In finance, such moves can often be seen as efforts to refocus the company. But they can also serve doubly to indicate red flags about the company’s current state. Gelsinger’s actions could be likened to a ship captain lightening the load to stay afloat. Essential, yes, but not reassuring for those aboard.

Speculations Around Qualcomm Takeover

The standing rumor of Qualcomm considering a takeover of Intel, despite being dubbed “intriguing but impractical” by Bank of America on Sep 23, 2024, also threw gasoline on the fire. Regulatory hurdles, massive financial challenges, and Intel’s existing debt were all cited as reasons this marriage of giants would likely not come to fruition.

However, even the whisper of such talks sent ripples through the market. Securities trading is a sensitive game; even rumors can shift perceptions and stock prices. Investors grappled with the double-edged idea: Indeed, Qualcomm could benefit from scale advantages, but would Intel’s burdens weigh it down?

Expanding Collaboration with AWS and CHIPS Funding

Intel’s announcement regarding an expanded collaboration with Amazon Web Services on AI and server CPU chips, combined with $3B in U.S. CHIPS funding, provided a glimpse of hope on Sep 17, 2024. Establishing Intel Foundry as a subsidiary and new structural changes signaled a forward-looking strategy. Though Intel faces the challenge of proving the financial viability of these changes, the market is watching for any beacon in the storm.

Challenges in Autonomous Tech Sector

Another issue Intel faces is the potential U.S. restrictions on Chinese and Russian technology. Given Intel’s significant stakes in the autonomous tech sector, this challenge could hamper its growth trajectory. The news on Sep 23, 2024, painted a somber picture of Intel’s geopolitically influenced struggles. The restrictions pose a substantial barrier and further complicate the global playbook for Intel. Like a soccer team losing a star player, Intel’s ability to compete on an international level could be significantly hobbled.

Missed Contracts and Paused Projects

Few blows strike harder than losing multi-billion dollar deals. Intel’s failure to secure a contract for Sony’s PlayStation 6 chip to AMD and TSMC further dims the future. The contract would have been worth billions in revenue, a significant lost opportunity. This came to light on Sep 16, 2024, and was another gut punch, though it wasn’t entirely unexpected given Intel’s well-publicized operational issues.

Furthermore, Intel’s decision to pause manufacturing projects in Poland and Germany hints at a broader recalibration or perhaps a financial belt-tightening. These moves, seemingly tactical in reducing expenditures, will likely face severe scrutiny in the marketplace. Investors are quick to spot when strategies shift from expansion to preservation, and Intel’s pause in these projects on Sep 16, 2024, further emphasizes cash flow constraints.

Market Reaction and Stock Price Predictions

Given the string of challenges Intel faces, the market has remained on edge. The stock data reflects this sentiment, evident in its jagged trendlines and sudden drops. The fluctuation seen between $23.72 and $22.755 over a short span demonstrates the volatility Intel has succumbed to.

Technical analysis from the stock data shows a resistance point around $23.72 and immediate support at $22.755. The recent drops below $23 signal investor hesitation and lack of confidence. Fundamentally, Intel’s stock isn’t poised to break out without substantial positive catalysts either.

Insights and Speculated Performance

Key financial ratios present a troubling snapshot. The company’s ebitdamargin of 18.4% and short-term liquidity ratios suggest operational issues and strained financial health that cannot be discounted. Moreover, its enterprise value of $140.2B dwarfs the market cap, indicating potentially over-leveraged operations.

From the recent earnings report, it’s clear that Intel’s cash flow is a significant concern. The operating cash flow of $2.3B, while substantial, is coupled with an investing cash flow of negative $9.1B. The net income from continuing operations is a loss of $1.65B, reflecting deeper operational inefficiencies.

Given the performance metrics and current market sentiments, predictions for Intel’s stock are cautious at best. Until Intel can prove profitable restructuring or land significant contracts, its stock price likely continues to drift or edge lower.

Conclusion: Is It Too Late to Buy Intel Stock?

With so many variables at play, Intel’s stock isn’t for the faint-hearted. The company’s aggressive restructuring, combined with high profile downgrades and missed opportunities, creates an environment thick with uncertainty. Intel’s recent actions—shedding workforce, slimming real estate, and missing out on lucrative contracts—paint a picture of a company in the midst of a major transition.

As an investor considering Intel, remember investing isn’t just about the numbers; it’s also about the story those numbers tell. Intel’s current story is one of a struggling giant trying to find its footing amidst shifting sands. Before making any moves, keep an eye on Intel’s next quarterly results and any significant news from its restructuring efforts. Navigating storms isn’t easy, but sometimes, the calm right after offers the best opportunities. Only time will tell if Intel can indeed weather its current challenges and emerge stronger.

Curious about this stock and eager to learn more? Dive deeper into the world of trading with Timothy Sykes, renowned for his expertise in penny stocks. Explore his top picks and discover the strategies that have propelled him to success. Start your journey towards financial growth and trading mastery!

But wait, there’s more! Elevate your trading game with StocksToTrade, the ultimate platform for traders. With specialized tools for swing and day trading, StocksToTrade harnesses the power of Artificial Intelligence to guide you through the market’s twists and turns. Discover insights on Robinhood penny stocks and top biotech picks to fuel your trading journey:

Ready to embark on your financial adventure? Click the links and let the journey unfold.


How much has this post helped you?


Leave a reply

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”