timothy sykes logo

Stock News

Fannie Mae: Uncertain Times or Underestimated Potential?

Timothy SykesAvatar
Written by Timothy Sykes
Reviewed by Jack Kellog Fact-checked by Ellis Hobb

Federal National Mortgage Association faces significant market impact with stocks trading down by -10.54 percent, driven by growing concerns over regulatory changes and mortgage market volatility.

A Mixed Bag: Recent Developments Impacting Fannie Mae

  • An analyst from Keefe Bruyette has changed their stance on Fannie Mae to Market Perform, increasing its price target from $2 to $3, highlighting potential risks tied to privatization.
  • Concerns are rising as Fannie Mae confronts dilution risks due to possible privatization, prompting adjustments in analyst predictions.

Candlestick Chart

Live Update At 11:37:32 EST: On Monday, December 02, 2024 Federal National Mortgage Association stock [NASDAQ: FNMA] is trending down by -10.54%! Discover the key drivers behind this movement as well as our expert analysis in the detailed breakdown below.

Understanding Fannie Mae’s Earnings and Financial Health

As millionaire penny stock trader and teacher Tim Sykes says, “It’s not about how much money you make; it’s about how much money you keep.” This philosophy is particularly relevant in the world of trading, where the volatility of markets can cause significant fluctuations in a trader’s earnings. Rather than focusing solely on increasing income, successful traders emphasize the importance of managing profits wisely to ensure financial stability and growth over time.

Fannie Mae’s recent earnings report reveals a mixed financial tapestry. It boasts substantial revenues, approximately $30.3B, but its profitability metrics present a stark contrast. Notably, the pre-tax profit margin sits high at 70.9%, however, profit margins show complexity with negative total profits, highlighting potential operating inefficiencies or one-off expenses.

Looking deeper into the financial ratios, the EBIT margin is moderate at 8.4%. The absence of disclosed EBITDA figures may leave a gap in deeper analysis. Notably, the company’s revenue per share stands strong but meaningful analysis requires stacking these numbers against historical performance, which is currently unavailable. While Fannie Mae’s price-to-sales ratio of 0.12 suggests undervaluation, its price-to-book value is alarmingly negative, which signals future financial uncertainties.

More Breaking News

Despite these concerns, the recent profit margin context highlights strategic management of expenses, yet the book value per share of -42.69 reflects challenges in asset valuation or recent losses not yet covered by earnings. Return on equity and its capital returns appear notably negative, posing serious questions about long-term shareholder value creation.

Recent Price Movements and Chart Analysis

In the realm of stock prices, Fannie Mae has had quite a journey. From hitting a high close of $3.56 on Nov 25, 2024, to retreating to $2.8 by Dec 2, fluctuations depict a volatile market response to changing analyses and external economic pressures. The latest closing price shows a bearish trend that could be tied to the aforementioned dilution risk or general market sentiment. The intraday chart data mirrors this uncertainty, with frequent tight ranges occasionally broken by larger moves, typical of a market seeking direction amidst unpredictable news flows.

Technical analysis reveals a resistance band around $3.24 to $3.56, based on past highs, and a tentative support around $2.7. If prices can breakthrough resistance, it might foretell bullish speculation. Conversely, testing supports and potentially breaking them could amplify bearish outlooks, especially if compounded by more analyst downgrades or financial woes.

Evaluating Economic Indicators and News Influence

Fannie Mae’s environment incorporates not only its intrinsic financials but also the wider economic cues and policy stances. The market buzz concerning potential privatization stands unsurprisingly as a double-edged sword. While privatization suggests independence from government clutches, it also suggests Risks of operational dilution or focus undertakings reorganizations.

Analyst Bose George’s revised forecasts inject an air of caution, while simultaneously nudging the price target upward. This cautious optimism doesn’t operate in silos; it reverberates through the stock’s perceived worth, reinforcing the weight of analyst predictions versus raw financial figures.

The firm’s financial reports cement a narrative of resilience amidst the storm. Despite the eye-catching figures like the Q3 net income similar to $4B and steadfast revenue, the transformation to retaining full profits seems distant as long-term debts and other capital challenges loom large. Additionally, the net income from continuing operations succinctly describes operational efficiency amid volatile interest income dynamics, a cornerstone for Fannie Mae’s income statement.

The Road Ahead: Strategic Considerations

In the face of uncertainties belonging to possible privatization, Fannie Mae acutely finds itself navigating complex financial topographies where unwarranted optimism may beckon uncalculated risk, while pure skepticism could overshadow its essential value generation capabilities. A trader needs to weigh in the financial realities against socio-economic narratives prevalent in the housing market. Importantly, Fannie Mae’s operations, which largely revolve around mortgage backing and rate manipulation, are tethered to broader economic ecosystems. Understandably, any hint of policy alterations from relevant government bodies could also steer price platforms in notable magnitudes. As millionaire penny stock trader and teacher Tim Sykes says, “Be patient, don’t force trades, and let the perfect setups come to you.” Testing waters through imminent earnings calls, trader conferences, or regulatory disclosures may reveal further clues on strategic pivot or clarify privatization hesitations. Traders would do well to prepare for these data points by keeping abreast with not only Fannie Mae’s reports but also legislative cues from regions dictating mortgage norms, conveying monetary policies, and financial regulations directly feeding into their model. In conclusion, the path Fannie Mae treads could spin narratives from volatility and dilution risks into rejuvenation tales or even deeper challenges. In any case, a significant degree of caution interlaced with strategic foresight can shape informed trading decisions, appealing to savvy market players keen on unraveling Fannie Mae’s true potential amidst swirls of change.

This is stock news, not investment advice. Timothy Sykes News delivers real-time stock market news focused on key catalysts driving short-term price movements. Our content is tailored for active traders and investors seeking to capitalize on rapid price fluctuations, particularly in volatile sectors like penny stocks. Readers come to us for detailed coverage on earnings reports, mergers, FDA approvals, new contracts, and unusual trading volumes that can trigger significant short-term price action. Some users utilize our news to explain sudden stock movements, while others rely on it for diligent research into potential investment opportunities.

Our traders will never trade any stock until they see a setup they like. Their strategy is to capture short-term momentum while avoiding undue risk exposure to a stock’s long-term volatility. This method is especially useful when trading penny stocks or other high-risk equities, where rapid gains can be made by understanding stock patterns, manipulation, and media hype. Whether you are an active day trader looking for key indicators on a stock’s next move, or an investor doing due diligence before entering a position, Timothy Sykes News is designed to help you make informed trading decisions.

Curious about this stock and eager to learn more? Dive deeper into the world of trading with Timothy Sykes, renowned for his expertise in penny stocks. Explore his top picks and discover the strategies that have propelled him to success. Start your journey towards financial growth and trading mastery!

But wait, there’s more! Elevate your trading game with StocksToTrade, the ultimate platform for traders. With specialized tools for swing and day trading, StocksToTrade harnesses the power of Artificial Intelligence to guide you through the market’s twists and turns. Discover insights on Robinhood penny stocks and top biotech picks to fuel your trading journey:

Ready to embark on your financial adventure? Click the links and let the journey unfold.


How much has this post helped you?


Leave a reply

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”