timothy sykes logo

Stock News

Is It Too Late to Buy ChargePoint Stock?

Timothy SykesAvatar
Written by Timothy Sykes
Reviewed by Jack Kellogg Fact-checked by Ellis Hobbs

ChargePoint Holdings Inc. is experiencing a significant market movement with its stocks trading down by 3.97 percent on Wednesday. This downturn is likely influenced by key news reports about operational challenges and intensified competition in the EV charging sector. Financial analysts are also closely watching broader market pressures and evolving regulatory landscapes, which collectively paint a challenging scenario for the company.

Recent Developments Draw Attention

Candlestick Chart

Live Update at 16:13:01 EST: On Wednesday, September 18, 2024 ChargePoint Holdings Inc. stock [NYSE: CHPT] is trending down by -3.97%! Discover the key drivers behind this movement as well as our expert analysis in the detailed breakdown below.

  • Q2 earnings per share (EPS) for ChargePoint Holdings reported at (16c), missing the consensus of (10c), alongside revenue of $109M, trailing behind the expected $113.6M.
  • TD Cowen downgraded ChargePoint to Hold, amid an “EV recession,” shifting the price target down to $2 from $3 after its Q2 report, and job cut news, resulting in an 18% fall to $1.39.
  • ChargePoint foresees Q3 revenue to be substantially below analyst expectations, guiding for $85M-$95M compared to the consensus of $136M, causing a stock price drop of 10.95%.

ChargePoint Holdings Inc.’s Recent Earnings Report and Financial Metrics

ChargePoint Holdings, ticker symbol CHPT, has been on quite a roller coaster lately. They recently reported Q2 earnings that left investors scratching their heads. With an EPS of (16c), they didn’t quite meet Wall Street’s hopes of (10c). Revenue too had a similar story, coming in at $109M, shy of the $113.6M expectations. This led many to ponder—what’s next for ChargePoint?

Now, let’s dive into some numbers. ChargePoint managed to narrow their loss to $0.16 per share, compared to $0.35 in the same period last year. That’s a silver lining in their Q2 report. But revenue plunged to $108.5M from $150.5M year over year. They guided Q3 revenue between $85M-$95M, which is way below analysts’ forecast of $136M.

Here’s where things get interesting. The company decided to cut 15% of its global workforce to trim down operating expenses. However, this move, coupled with missed revenue targets, had a noticeable impact, with the stock price taking a significant hit, falling to $1.39.

Looking at the price movements from the provided CSV data, we see that CHPT’s stock has been fluctuating within a narrow range over the days. On 18 Sep 2024, it opened at $1.49, hit a high of $1.57, and closed at $1.45. Some might say these movements indicate jittery investor nerves, and rightly so.

But let’s not just skim the surface. Dive a bit deeper, and the financial metrics tell another story. ChargePoint has an EBIT margin of -83.4%, which isn’t exactly a party starter. Their gross margin is a mere 10.8%. They’re operating with a significant negative profit margin of -89.12%. Continued losses are draining their cash reserves faster than a leaking bucket.

From the balance sheet, ChargePoint has total assets of $1B, out of which cash and cash equivalents stand at $243M. Even though they have a decent current ratio of 2, their quick ratio is 1.1, indicating strained short-term liquidity. Long-term debt sits heavy at $302M. Their leverage ratio is at a concerning 4.4, signifying high debt reliance.

Let’s Paint the Bigger Picture

ChargePoint’s saga is an echo of broader market tremors. The electric vehicle (EV) sector is experiencing what some analysts are calling a “recession”. TD Cowen’s downgrade from Buy to Hold comes amidst this EV recession. The firm adjusted the price target to $2 from $3 following ChargePoint’s Q2 report and job cut announcements, giving investors another reason for skepticism.

Though the scorecards and headlines may look grim, it’s essential to remember that ChargePoint, striving to command its space in the EV network market, still holds potential. Their job cut strategy, though on the surface a cost-saving move, could also be seen as a refinement step towards achieving profitability.

Remember the days of early tech giants, who despite significant bumps, went through periods of restructuring and costs amendments before bursting into the mainstream?

ChargePoint is aiming for efficiency, even if it’s through the bitter pill of workforce trimming. The company has indicated an improvement in gross margin for three consecutive quarters, which suggests that they are catching up in some ways.

Still, though, the path to profitability is an uphill climb, considering their current debt levels and continuous operational losses.

Highlighting the Key Ratios and Possible Market Implications

Key ratios like the total debt to equity (1.31) and long-term debt to capital (0.57) present a broader perspective on how the company manages its obligations versus its equity.

ChargePoint’s leverage ratio at 4.4 is a red flag, hinting at a heavily debt-reliant operation. This might be sustainable in the short-term, but it adds immense pressure in long-term scenarios, especially when the revenue stream isn’t meeting expectations.

Their operating and free cash flows are also negative, indicating more cash going out than coming in from their core operations. With cash flow from continuing operating activities sitting at -$51.2M and total cash flows changing by -$49.1M, ChargePoint is, in essence, spending more on running costs and investments than they are making from revenues.

More Breaking News

Stock Movement Predictions: Where is ChargePoint Heading?

The stock price closing trends from intraday charts show price fluctuations but consistently staying around the $1.45 – $1.50 range. During trading on 18 Sep 2024, it opened at $1.49 and closed at $1.45 with a high of $1.57, indicating brief bursts of investor confidence followed by settling prices.

Such price movements suggest a tight range traders are juggling with, showcasing uncertainty but not necessarily a complete lack of belief in the stock.

The price drop after missing revenue expectations, coupled with future lower revenue guidance, makes one wonder about the confidence levels of the investors. A decrease by 10.95% in the stock as predicted due to underwhelming Q3 guidance is significant. It highlights the cautious investor sentiments based on upcoming quarters’ earnings and overall market conditions in the EV sector.

Unpacking the News: What Does This Mean for ChargePoint?

TD Cowen’s downgrade amidst the “EV recession” suggests market-wide strain affecting ChargePoint specifically. The disappointing Q2 earnings, below consensus revenue, coupled with extensive job cuts, paint a picture of a company wrestling with operational inefficiencies and adapting to broader market contractions.

ChargePoint’s projected tumble in Q3 revenue to the $85M-$95M range is a significant miss from the analyst consensus of $136M. This dramatic guide down is a flashing red light, suggesting lingering or worsening market conditions or perhaps internal challenges that might be deeper than anticipated.

From investors’ perspective, such movements spark cautiousness. Markets often react adversely to drastic revenue downscales because they signal underlying issues—either in market demand, supply chain efficiency, operational bottlenecks, or all of the above. Consequently, the 10.95% drop in stock price isn’t just a reactive movement but an embodiment of shaken trust and recalibrated investor expectations.

Conclusion: Is ChargePoint a Penny Stock to Trade?

So where does this leave ChargePoint? With the current backdrop of an EV market recession, missed earnings, and revised future expectations, ChargePoint seems more like a trader’s stock than a long-term investment.

Their attempt to cut operational expenses by reducing their workforce might translate to a leaner operational structure. However, with the persistent challenges in revenue, doubts about their ability to achieve break-even quarters linger. Given the edges and creases in ChargePoint’s financial tapestry, it might be more prudent to approach CHPT as a penny stock—trade on trends but invest with caution.

Remember, the EV revolution still beckons, and ChargePoint, in its restructuring and refining phase, could eventually find a firmer footing. Till then, the prudent play might be to stay agile, ready to trade on news-driven movements, but wary of long-haul bets.

Curious about this stock and eager to learn more? Dive deeper into the world of trading with Timothy Sykes, renowned for his expertise in penny stocks. Explore his top picks and discover the strategies that have propelled him to success. Start your journey towards financial growth and trading mastery!

But wait, there’s more! Elevate your trading game with StocksToTrade, the ultimate platform for traders. With specialized tools for swing and day trading, StocksToTrade harnesses the power of Artificial Intelligence to guide you through the market’s twists and turns. Discover insights on Robinhood penny stocks and top biotech picks to fuel your trading journey:

Ready to embark on your financial adventure? Click the links and let the journey unfold.


How much has this post helped you?


Leave a reply

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”