timothy sykes logo

Two Trades That Reinforce the Rules

Timothy SykesAvatar
Written by Timothy Sykes
Updated 10/26/2026 7 min read

One of the most important lessons for new traders is that certain rules are immutable.

Unlike the pirate’s code, these rules never change…

I’m not a perfect trader (obviously).

Sometimes I get greedy, or overstay my welcome.

Other times the trade just doesn’t work. I’m fine with that.

But as much as possible, I follow my own rules.

Even if it means locking in a loss I don’t want to take.

Or a choppy win where I thought it could go more…

2 Trades With Different Outcomes

These two trades were completely different patterns with different outcomes.

One was a solid win, and the other an annoying loss.

But with both trades, I stuck to my rules.

That’s important, because my long-term goal is not to win or lose on any one trade, right?

My goal is to become a better trader (and better teacher).

With that in mind, let’s break them down…

The Weekend Trade That Didn’t Work

Here’s what happened on my latest Weekend Strategy trade…

On Friday (Oct. 23), Nautilus Biotechnology (NASDAQ: NAUT) was a classic example of what I look for.

What did I see?

NAUT Was a Big Percent Gainer

Post image

Get my after-hours watchlist, free

The Night Tape, every trading day after the closing bell, plus The Second Session guide.

For weekend trades, I typically look for something up at least 20% on the day.

With all the crazy 100%+ spikers we’ve seen the past few months, that might not seem like much. But for a potential weekend trade it’s good.

Why?

Because if a stock is up too much, everyone is already watching. So, for weekend trades, I prefer when a stock does this…

NAUT 10/23/26, 1-min candles, solid weekend strategy setup
NAUT 10/23/26, 1-min candles, solid weekend strategy setup

As you can see, NAUT spiked around 27% in the first 90-minutes on Friday.

Why did it spike?

That brings up my second criteria…

NAUT Had a News Catalyst

On October 15, the company announced it would be reporting earnings today (Oct. 27).

Source: GlobeNewswire

That’s not very exciting, right? But the company also presented at a conference last week and its technology got hyped on a podcast.

That combination got enough attention to make the Friday move happen.

Which brings up the final thing I look for in a weekend trade…

NAUT Was Holding Its Gains Going Into the Close

I want to see a stock spike and then close at, or near, the high-of-day.

NAUT met my criteria, so I bought it on Friday afternoon.

Unfortunately, I got caught in a Monday morning washout…

NAUT 10/23-26/26, 1-min candles, weekend trade
NAUT 10/23-26/26, 1-min candles, weekend trade

This loss was annoying because I tried to get out sooner, but couldn’t (broker issues).

Still, considering how far NAUT dropped, I’m glad that I followed…

Rule #1: Cut Losses Quickly

The reality is, sometimes you get stuck in a trade longer than you want.

And that makes rule #1 even MORE important.

Imagine how much worse it could have been if I’d stayed in.

When you’re wrong, cut losses!

Now let’s take a look at my second trade…

Monday Morning Breakout

ClearOne Inc. (NASDAQ: CLRO) was a big runner on Friday. After it double topped in after-hours trading, it faded hard.

It spiked again in premarket trading yesterday…

CLRO, 10/23-26/26, 1-min candles
CLRO, 10/23-26/26, 1-min candles

The double top on Friday was ~$4.67. When it spiked in premarket yesterday, it hit resistance around $4.35.

I bought the breakout, but not at either of those two levels.

Instead, I waited for confirmation and took advantage as CLRO broke through a key psychological level…

CLRO, 10/23-26/26, half-dollar psychological level
CLRO, 10/23-26/26, half-dollar psychological level

I bought CLRO as it passed through the half-dollar level at $4.50. Remember, whole and half dollar levels draw traders in.

Some people asked why I bought there, instead of at the exact breakout over Friday’s highs (or Monday’s premarket highs).

3 Reasons to Wait for the Breakout

Check it out…

  1. CLRO spiked, pulled back to VWAP, and spiked again (that confirmed it could hold VWAP)
  2. The second move confirmed my thesis that it could break out over premarket highs
  3. It crossed that key half-dollar level (it’s always good if a breakout lines up with a key psychological level)

Here’s my trade…

CLRO, 10/26/26, morning breakout play
CLRO, 10/26/26, morning breakout play

Buying there gave me a clear risk level at the premarket high (or VWAP). Also, I knew it could potentially top again where it double topped on Friday.

It was a nice SOLID win to start the week. Most importantly, it reinforced another important rule in today’s market…

Sell Into Strength

CLRO was moving so fast (and was so choppy) that I was happy to sell into strength.

I can’t tell you how often I see new (and experienced) traders refuse to sell into strength because they want more.

Just sell into strength, okay?

Remember, these aren’t swing trades.

If your goal is to grow a small account, then do yourself a favor and follow the rules I’ve outlined in these trades.

Key Takeaway

Every trader I know makes mistakes.

And we all have trades where something happens that’s outside of our control.

But if you follow the rules meticulously, it helps you to stay in the game long enough to get past the learning curve.

THEN you’re on your way to freedom.

Cheers,

Tim Sykes


How much has this post helped you?



Leave a reply

Author card Timothy Sykes picture

Timothy Sykes

Tim Sykes is a penny stock trader and teacher who became a self-made millionaire by the age of 22 by trading $12,415 of bar mitzvah money. After becoming disenchanted with the hedge fund world, he established the Tim Sykes Trading Challenge to teach aspiring traders how to follow his trading strategies. He’s been featured in a variety of media outlets including CNN, Larry King, Steve Harvey, Forbes, Men’s Journal, and more. He’s also an active philanthropist and environmental activist, a co-founder of Karmagawa, and has donated millions of dollars to charity.
Read More

* Results are not typical and will vary from person to person. Making money trading stocks takes time, dedication, and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing in the stock market, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk. See Terms of Service here

The available research on day trading suggests that most active traders lose money. Fees and overtrading are major contributors to these losses.

A 2000 study called “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors” evaluated 66,465 U.S. households that held stocks from 1991 to 1996. The households that traded most averaged an 11.4% annual return during a period where the overall market gained 17.9%. These lower returns were attributed to overconfidence.

A 2014 paper (revised 2019) titled “Learning Fast or Slow?” analyzed the complete transaction history of the Taiwan Stock Exchange between 1992 and 2006. It looked at the ongoing performance of day traders in this sample, and found that 97% of day traders can expect to lose money from trading, and more than 90% of all day trading volume can be traced to investors who predictably lose money. Additionally, it tied the behavior of gamblers and drivers who get more speeding tickets to overtrading, and cited studies showing that legalized gambling has an inverse effect on trading volume.

A 2019 research study (revised 2020) called “Day Trading for a Living?” observed 19,646 Brazilian futures contract traders who started day trading from 2013 to 2015, and recorded two years of their trading activity. The study authors found that 97% of traders with more than 300 days actively trading lost money, and only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage ($16 USD per day). They hypothesized that the greater returns shown in previous studies did not differentiate between frequent day traders and those who traded rarely, and that more frequent trading activity decreases the chance of profitability.

These studies show the wide variance of the available data on day trading profitability. One thing that seems clear from the research is that most day traders lose money .

Millionaire Media 66 W Flagler St. Ste. 900 Miami, FL 33130 United States (888) 878-3621 This is for information purposes only as Millionaire Media LLC nor Timothy Sykes is registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment adviser. No information herein is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security or fund. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes cannot and does not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. The reader bears responsibility for his/her own investment research and decisions, should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment, and investigate and fully understand any and all risks before investing. Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes in no way warrants the solvency, financial condition, or investment advisability of any of the securities mentioned in communications or websites. In addition, Millionaire Media LLC and Timothy Sykes accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this information. This information is not intended to be used as the sole basis of any investment decision, nor should it be construed as advice designed to meet the investment needs of any particular investor. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns.

Citations for Disclaimer

Barber, Brad M. and Odean, Terrance, Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Available at SSRN: “Day Trading for a Living?”

Barber, Brad M. and Lee, Yi-Tsung and Liu, Yu-Jane and Odean, Terrance and Zhang, Ke, Learning Fast or Slow? (May 28, 2019). Forthcoming: Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535636”

Chague, Fernando and De-Losso, Rodrigo and Giovannetti, Bruno, Day Trading for a Living? (June 11, 2020). Available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3423101”